|
|
Post by gus on Apr 2, 2013 20:01:47 GMT -8
I wanted to clarify that Nancy wrote Adam a check to buy a camera, not a gun. Warrant5, Exhibit #612 says "a holiday card with BOA check #462 made out to Adam for the purchase of a C183 (weapon) authored by Nancy". They put in the (weapon) part. A C183 is a Kodak 'point and shoot' camera.
It has been mentioned to me that maybe they meant CZ83, which is a pistol, available in 380 or 9mm, but not 45, which I am well aware of. Adam had a 9mm with him, but it was a Sig. I'm wondering what kind of detectives are working this case. Either they can't read or they can't write. It would have been nice if they had included the amount and date of the check. Ohh, it's coming in June.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 20:17:58 GMT -8
Exactly-- the warrant results or some official document included a card and check and note to buy another gun.... WHAT gun? They were all registered to Nancy..... So it's as you say, either the reporting person didn't know wtf a C183 was or wanted to dramatize the list of items found...
And people don't QUESTION this stuff??
|
|
|
|
Post by gus on Apr 2, 2013 20:46:27 GMT -8
|
|
appleneesy32
Contributor
Changing the world with my short-term weapon known as journalism.
Posts: 11 
|
Post by appleneesy32 on Apr 3, 2013 7:04:01 GMT -8
It's funny to me that a camera would be considered a weapon...when in fact...it was a camera that created all of this disinformation and confusion in the first place.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2013 19:23:27 GMT -8
Does this clear up some of the mess, gus? Thank you, shazam.
I no longer save photos, videos, or articles to my machine.
|
|
|
|
Post by gus on Apr 3, 2013 20:53:23 GMT -8
Not really Pink. These warrants are supposed to be legal documents and filled out by professional investigators. If Nancy's check said C183 then they should have left it at that, instead of inserting their '(weapon)' part. If it said C183 and they didn't know what a C183 was, they should have 'googled it' to see what a C183 was before they added the (weapon) part. If Nancy's handwriting was illegible, they should have noted that or left it out entirely. If it said CZ83, they should have gotten that right on the warrant. No, I still don't buy it.
|
|
|
|
Post by gus on Apr 3, 2013 20:56:15 GMT -8
There are several other errors in the warrants. Off the top of my head was they said the Enfield rifle was 323 cal. They are 303 cal.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjordan456 on Apr 4, 2013 1:42:15 GMT -8
There are several other errors in the warrants. Off the top of my head was they said the Enfield rifle was 323 cal. They are 303 cal. wow,...even the address is perhaps defective on one of the warrant as the numeric 36 is away from Yogananda Street so could be plans of the Galaxstopo to be positioning C183 as a weapon of mind-war prior to declaring some warrants to be invalid ...... we know the infamous WATFOR {World Allinance Tard-Farce Operation Regime} does not want us questioning what things are for thus whoever has the approved FEMA card would be exempted from them and i though shazam was f-d-up,..... hm,... maybe better think again
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2013 6:43:49 GMT -8
It's funny to me that a camera would be considered a weapon...when in fact...it was a camera that created all of this disinformation and confusion in the first place. lol,, a camera MIGHT be the deadliest weapon in this charade, if Shannon Hicks aka Jessica Hill ever releases her photos. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2013 6:53:55 GMT -8
gus, Exactly--the warrants and findings are LEGAL documents, not things to be added to or opinionized/dramatized.. Give us the FACTS, not some tweaked-up list. ......... One possible thing was a mis-reading of N.Lanza's handwriting.. My husband grew up in Germany and his 1s and 7s look alike until he strikes through the 7s. She's a world traveler, might have picked up some characteristics while abroad, depends on how long she visited or lived there.
Whatever the cause, the report should not have been edited or 'explained' bc the explanation only confused matters. Whoever released the findings should be disciplined for--tampering with the frikkin evidence....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2013 6:55:36 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2013 7:12:49 GMT -8
it sure says so.. gee, i'm convinced. <sarcasm>
|
|
|
|
Post by gus on Apr 4, 2013 11:07:12 GMT -8
Speaking of warrants and addresses, I believe the Lanzas owned another house at 13? Yoga st. I haven't heard a peep about that for a long time. Anybody?
|
|
|
|
Post by gus on Apr 5, 2013 17:27:20 GMT -8
"and i though shazam was f-d-up,..... hm,... maybe better think again" Is that directed at me? If it is, come out and say what you mean. Not that I give a crap what you think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2013 20:29:44 GMT -8
gus, I think what nic's saying is that shazam might not be as messed up as nic thought, not that you are as messed up as shazam  ...nic's hard to understand sometimes.. NIC,, if I'm wrong, tell me! |
|
. Where are you getting that from? You are saying that Nancy's note told him to buy another gun? All I have seen is this: warrant 5, Exhibit 612; "for the purchase of a c183" 
...nic's hard to understand sometimes..