Check in sign

[tonym]

And don't tell me you people don't watch the NEWS !! I live in FL and when there's a Hurricane we all watch the TV 24/7 even though we could look out the window and see what's happening. It's human nature- as is crying !!

[Deleted]

Mar 30, 2013 15:44:08 GMT -8 numberfive said:

I still have a very hard time believing that 450+ children were herded into that firehouse, trucks or no. It's just ridiculous. And not one camera caught them.

I do as well but I did see a vid with a school bus leaving the area with a bunch of kids on it but it would hardly accommodate that many and with all of the blue and or green screens that can be used who knows what is real. In light of the screens I do know a green screen was used at the firehouse when I saw a vid with the SHED that appeared only a FEW FEET away from the firehouse when it is really about 300 ft away.

[tonym]

When confronted with factual evidence that cannot be disputed, an opponent in a debate has 3 options. 1) Attack their opponent personally 2) Agree with their opponent 3) Quit the debate (discussion)

[Deleted]

Mar 30, 2013 22:21:07 GMT -8 tonym said:

Another UNANSWERED QUESTION - "Parents Must Check In" is shorter than "Everyone Must Check In" . It is in the Gene Rosen interview conducted at 2:34 PM on Dec 14. What are we stupid ?

In answer to your question, Tony, I don't know if you are stupid. I do know, however, that you are confused. The interview that you declare is on December 14 at 2:34 by Fox News was actually FOUR DAYS LATER (foxnewsinsider.com/2012/12/18/heart-wrenching-interview-gene-rosen-recalls-comforting-6-sandy-hook-students-who-fled-to-his-doorstep-after-newtown-shooting/). Is this factual enough for you?

[tonym]

Ok Mr. SHDad - why was there a sign that says "Everyone Must Check in ?"

[Deleted]

I don't know, Tony. It's a huge mystery. But I'll take a shot at it. Let's say you have a horrific crime scene, and a lot of departments need access. Do you (A) let anyone wander in, (B) post a guard and require people to explain themselves every time they need access, or (C) require people to sign in, and maybe get an ID so that they don't have to deal with security every time they walk into the school? If I was in charge, I would probably do (C). What would you do?

I assume this all means you're backing off of your original factual evidence, and looking for something new? If your goal was to attack the SH moms and get them to leave the forum, I think you succeeded.

[tonym]

I don't attack anyone. I have no motive. I do, however, have a genius level IQ. You certainly don't need one to realize that there has been no evidence presented that can validate the story that Adam Lanza killed 20 children on Dec. 14.
Your partial explanation that the sign was there days after the shooting to instruct 'Investigative Teams' makes sense to me, so I will let it go at that.
I will tell you that you have met your match with me, but if you wish to continue to answer questions, I do have more.

[Sandy Hook Hoax]